On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:47:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I do note how quilt emails are really hard to read, because that: > > Content-Disposition: inline > > makes gmail think it's flowed. > > Which works horribly badly for patches, surprise surprise. > > So I really wish quilt wouldn't do that. It does smell like a gmail > bug, but at the same time, why would you use "Content-Disposition: > inline" when you don't have an actual multi-part email? So I do blame > quilt too for sending nonsensical headers. > > (Yes, yes, I see the "It is permissible to use Content-Disposition on > the main body" in the RFC. But the RFC also makes it clear that it > actually matters for how things are presented, so saying "ok, I'll do > flowed" seems equally insane and equally technically RFC-compliant)
Quilt people, anything that can be done about that?
