On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */ > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h > > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ extern u64 fpu__get_supported_xfeatures_ > > */ > > static __always_inline __pure bool use_eager_fpu(void) > > { > > - return static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU); > > + return true; > > } > > Since this function returns always true then we can remove the code depending > on lazy FPU mode. > Actually this has already been done in "x86/fpu: Remove use_eager_fpu()" > Ref: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9365883/ > > > static void __init fpu__init_parse_early_param(void) > > { > > - if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "eagerfpu=off")) { > > - eagerfpu = DISABLE; > > - fpu__clear_eager_fpu_features(); > > - } > > Since this patch removes the kernel boot parameter "eagerfpu", maybe we > should remove it from the Documentation. > This has also been done by commit "x86/fpu: Finish excising 'eagerfpu'" > Ref: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9380673/ > > I will try backporting those patches unless anyone has any objections.
What are the git commit ids of those patches in Linus's tree? No need to point to patchwork links, I don't use that tool. thanks, greg k-h