Currently we can hit following assert when running numa bench: $ perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0cm --thp 1 perf: bench/numa.c:1577: __bench_numa: Assertion `!(!(((wait_stat) & 0x7f) == 0))' failed.
The assertion is correct, because we hit the SIGFPE in following line: Thread 2.2 "thread 0/0" received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffd28c6700 (LWP 11750)] 0x000.. in worker_thread (__tdata=0x7.. ) at bench/numa.c:1257 1257 td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9; We don't check if the runtime is actually bigger than 1 second, and thus this might end up with zero division within FPU. Adding the check to prevent this. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9y8n4x48mjbbcay73sq6n...@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 63eb49082774..44195514b19e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata) u8 *global_data; u8 *process_data; u8 *thread_data; - u64 bytes_done; + u64 bytes_done, secs; long work_done; u32 l; struct rusage rusage; @@ -1254,7 +1254,8 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata) timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff); td->runtime_ns = diff.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC; td->runtime_ns += diff.tv_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC; - td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9; + secs = td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC; + td->speed_gbs = secs ? bytes_done / secs / 1e9 : 0; getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, &rusage); td->system_time_ns = rusage.ru_stime.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC; -- 2.13.6
