On 06/25/18 08:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:02 AM Bae, Chang Seok
>> <chang.seok....@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Still setup_cpu_number() sucks.
>>>
>>> How about setup_cpu_and_node_number()?
>>
>> setup_fast_cpu_node_nr()? setup_cpunr_regs()? I don't have any
>> brilliant ideas. Thomas?
>
> It's really hard to find a good one. setup_cpu_node_cache() might work, but
> it's not brilliant either.
>
Since this applies to the getcpu(2) system call (in addition to the
kernel usage), perhaps setup_getcpu()?
-hpa
