On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 06/25/18 08:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:02 AM Bae, Chang Seok > >> <chang.seok....@intel.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Still setup_cpu_number() sucks. > >>> > >>> How about setup_cpu_and_node_number()? > >> > >> setup_fast_cpu_node_nr()? setup_cpunr_regs()? I don't have any > >> brilliant ideas. Thomas? > > > > It's really hard to find a good one. setup_cpu_node_cache() might work, but > > it's not brilliant either. > > > > Since this applies to the getcpu(2) system call (in addition to the > kernel usage), perhaps setup_getcpu()?
Works for me.