On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:31:18PM +0100, Allan Xavier wrote:
> > Is there a particular concern you're trying to address by having the logic > > there > > instead? > > Thanks for the patch and the excellent problem description. I think the > concern is that the overlap might cause other unforeseen issues (now or > in the future). Yeah, overlapping symbols are just really weird and unfortunate, I've no idea what the GCC people were thinking. Note how find_symbol_containing() already more or less assumed !overlap.
