At 21.29 08/12/00 +0100, Rasmus Andersen wrote:

>Hi.
>
>The following patch moves the page_table_lock in mm/* to cover the
>modification of mm->rss in 240-test12-pre7. It was inspired by a
>similar patch from davej(?) which covered too much, AFAIR. The item
>is on Tytso's ToDo list.

[...snip...]

>@@ -1076,7 +1076,9 @@
>                 flush_icache_page(vma, page);
>         }
>
>+       spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>         mm->rss++;
>+       spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>

[...snip...]

Why we couldn't use atomic_inc(&mm->rss) here and below, avoiding to wrap
the inc with a spin_lock()/spin_unlock() ?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to