Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 16:07:03 +0100
From: Roberto Fichera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
8 bits for a spinlock ? What kind of use we have here ?
Sparc32 (like some other older architectures) do not have a
word atomic update instruction, but it does have a byte spinlock.
To conserve space and implement the atomic update properly, we
use a spinlock in the top byte of the word.
All arch except Sparc32 don't have this trick.
This may not be true forever.
Also, this sematic was decided upon many eons ago, changing it a month
before 2.4.0 just to deal with this mm->rss atomicity issue is not
going to happen. The spinlock patch exists, and if nothing better
comes up, we should just use it.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
