3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com>
commit 0cd8116f172eed018907303dbff5c112690eeb91 upstream.
The "sector is in requested range" test used to determine whether
sectors should be re-locked or not is done on a variable that is reset
everytime we cross a chip boundary, which can lead to some blocks being
re-locked while the caller expect them to be unlocked.
Fix the check to make sure this cannot happen.
Fixes: 1648eaaa1575 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Support Persistent Protection Bits
(PPB) locking")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -2667,7 +2667,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock
* sectors shall be unlocked, so lets keep their locking
* status at "unlocked" (locked=0) for the final re-locking.
*/
- if ((adr < ofs) || (adr >= (ofs + len))) {
+ if ((offset < ofs) || (offset >= (ofs + len))) {
sect[sectors].chip = &cfi->chips[chipnum];
sect[sectors].adr = adr;
sect[sectors].locked = do_ppb_xxlock(
