3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>

[ Upstream commit 741a76b350897604c48fb12beff1c9b77724dc96 ]

Gaurav reported a problem with __kthread_parkme() where a concurrent
try_to_wake_up() could result in competing stores to ->state which,
when the TASK_PARKED store got lost bad things would happen.

The comment near set_current_state() actually mentions this competing
store, but only mentions the case against TASK_RUNNING. This same
store, with different timing, can happen against a subsequent !RUNNING
store.

This normally is not a problem, because as per that same comment, the
!RUNNING state store is inside a condition based wait-loop:

  for (;;) {
    set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
    if (!need_sleep)
      break;
    schedule();
  }
  __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);

If we loose the (first) TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE store to a previous
(concurrent) wakeup, the schedule() will NO-OP and we'll go around the
loop once more.

The problem here is that the TASK_PARKED store is not inside the
KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK condition wait-loop.

There is a genuine issue with sleeps that do not have a condition;
this is addressed in a subsequent patch.

Reported-by: Gaurav Kohli <gko...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/kthread.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -156,12 +156,13 @@ void *probe_kthread_data(struct task_str
 
 static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self)
 {
-       __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
-       while (test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) {
+       for (;;) {
+               set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
+               if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags))
+                       break;
                if (!test_and_set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags))
                        complete(&self->parked);
                schedule();
-               __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
        }
        clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags);
        __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);


Reply via email to