Anson Huang Best Regards!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 9:00 AM > To: Anson Huang <[email protected]> > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>; Robin Gong <[email protected]>; > Mark Rutland <[email protected]>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND > FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <[email protected]>; > linux-kernel <[email protected]>; Rob Herring > <[email protected]>; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer > <[email protected]>; Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>; > moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: imx6sl-evk: keep sw4 always on > > Hi Anson, > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Anson Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just want to know how to handle such case? The kernel patch will never > > be applied or is there any way to make kernel patch and dtb patch > > applied together to avoid any breakage? > > We always want to avoid breaking a working dtb when it is used with a newer > kernel. > > In this case we need to revert the kernel patch as it causes regression with > old > dtbs. So that mean such kind of kernel patch will never be into kernel? Even if it is a necessary patch for fixing some other issues? I just wonder how this case being handled. Anson.
