On 07/10/2018 11:56 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 5:04:21 PM CEST Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 07/10/2018 06:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 1:13:17 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 5:44:05 AM CEST Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 07/09/2018 04:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com> wrote:
Hi,
First thanks for the patch..
On 07/08/2018 04:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, July 2, 2018 11:41:42 PM CEST Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing two problems with commit 5088814a6e931 which is
"ACPICA: AML parser: attempt to continue loading table after error"
The first is this boot failure on a thunderX2:
[ 10.770098] ACPI Error: Ignore error and continue table load
[trimming]
]---
Which does appear to be the result of some bad data in the table, but it
was working with 4.17, and reverting this commit solves the problem.
Does the patch below make any difference?
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_ps_get_aml_opcod
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE_PTR(ps_get_aml_opcode, walk_state);
walk_state->aml = walk_state->parser_state.aml;
+ if (!walk_state->aml)
+ return AE_CTRL_PARSE_CONTINUE;
+
Well this seems to avoid the crash, but now it hangs right after on the
"Ignore error and continue table load" message.
Well, maybe we should just abort in that case.
I'm wondering what happens if you replace the return statement in the
patch above with
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_BAD_OPCODE)
Yes, that is where I went when I applied the patch but I used
AE_CTRL_TERMINATE, which terminates the loop in acpi_ps_parse_loop() and
that appears to successfully finish/terminate the initial parsing pass.
But, it then crashes in acpi_ns_lookup called via the
acpi_walk_resources sequences that goes through ut_evalute_object() due
to the path/scope_info->scope.node being ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT (-1) and
bypassing the null check. Adding a ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT check as well as the
null checks in acpi_ns_lookup results in a successful boot. Tracking
down how the terminate (or whatever) is leaving the info->prefix_node
(in acpi_ns_evaluate) set to ROOT_OBJECT instead of null, is something I
don't yet understand.
Anyway, I tried Using BAD_OPCODE rather than TERMINATE and it seems to
have the same basic result as PARSE_CONTINUE.
OK, thanks!
I evidently didn't look deep enough.
Can you please check the patch below?
I'm not sure if we can pass this broken state to
acpi_ps_complete_final_op(), so it may be necessary to return
an error directly when aml_op_start is NULL.
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
@@ -493,6 +493,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_ps_parse_loop(struct ac
ASL_CV_CAPTURE_COMMENTS(walk_state);
aml_op_start = parser_state->aml;
+ if (!aml_op_start)
+ break;
+
if (!op) {
status =
acpi_ps_create_op(walk_state, aml_op_start, &op);
--
So maybe something like this:
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
@@ -494,6 +494,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_ps_parse_loop(struct ac
aml_op_start = parser_state->aml;
if (!op) {
+ if (!aml_op_start)
+ return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_INTERNAL);
+
status =
acpi_ps_create_op(walk_state, aml_op_start, &op);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
This gets rid of the infinite loop, but its still has the problem with
acpi_ns_lookup crashing due to -1 in the scope.node.
OK, so do you mean that something like the patch below is needed for the
system to boot?
Yes, the machine is back to the pre 4.18 behavior (with the addition of
a lot of additional ACPI error messages) boot with those two changes.
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/nsaccess.c | 3 ++-
drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
@@ -494,6 +494,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_ps_parse_loop(struct ac
aml_op_start = parser_state->aml;
if (!op) {
+ if (!aml_op_start)
+ return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_INTERNAL);
+
status =
acpi_ps_create_op(walk_state, aml_op_start, &op);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsaccess.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsaccess.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsaccess.c
@@ -286,7 +286,8 @@ acpi_ns_lookup(union acpi_generic_state
/* Get the prefix scope. A null scope means use the root scope */
- if ((!scope_info) || (!scope_info->scope.node)) {
+ if ((!scope_info) || (!scope_info->scope.node) ||
+ (scope_info->scope.node == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT)) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_NAMES,
"Null scope prefix, using root node (%p)\n",
acpi_gbl_root_node));
