David, thanks for your comments.
On 15.06.07 11:54:24, David Rientjes wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Robert Richter wrote: > > > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/arch/i386/perfmon/perfmon.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc3.orig/arch/i386/perfmon/perfmon.c > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc3/arch/i386/perfmon/perfmon.c > > @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ char *pfm_arch_get_pmu_module_name(void) > > goto try_arch; > > } > > case 15: > > + case 16: > > /* All Opteron processors */ > > if (cpu_data->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) > > return "perfmon_k8"; > > Constants like these should be #define'd in a header file but, admittedly, > it might become a rather intrusive change at this point for the above > case. All current x86 CPU detection code in the kernel is using hard coded numbers. Introducing new defines for family and model numbers would not be suitable here. Thanks, -Robert -- AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany Operating System Research Center email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
