On 2018/7/16 21:38, Dominique Martinet wrote: > jiangyiwen wrote on Mon, Jul 16, 2018: >> You're right, this wake up operation should be put after the unlocking, >> I will resend it. In addition, whether I should resend this patch based >> on your 9p-next branch? > > There is a trivial conflict with Thomas' validate PDU length patch, > but as it is trivial either work for me - pick whichever is easier to > work with for you. > > The main reason I asked for a new version of the other patch is that the > IDR rework changed spin locks, so I'd rather it being clean. > > > Thanks, >
ok, I will resend the patch later based on linux-next branch. Thanks, Yiwen.
