On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:21:39AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org> wrote:
> > Right, I implement a more restrictive check.
>
> But the check needs to be correct or we'll mess up, right? I think
> the code will be much more robust and easier to review if you check
> "on the entry stack" instead of ">= the entry stack". (Or <= -- I can
> never remember how this works in AT&T syntax.)
Yeah, I re-used the check implemented on the NMI entry path, it checks
exactly for the entry-stack range.
Regards,
Joerg
