Quoting Michal Simek (2018-07-30 05:50:42) > On 26.7.2018 18:36, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Michal Simek (2018-07-25 02:51:14) > >> On 24.7.2018 20:14, Jolly Shah wrote: > >>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp-debug.h > >>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c create mode > >>>>> 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/xlnx,zynqmp-clk.h > >>>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It looks pretty calm over the last several series that's why when I get > >>>> an answer > >>>> from Stephen or Mike I will take this series via my tree and arm-soc > >>>> tree. > >>>> > >>>> I have applied 01-08 here > >>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynqmp/soc > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Michal > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks for merging the patches. > >>> By mistake I added “Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd sb...@kernel.org” for > >>> firmware bindings (Patch01). Stephen had reviewed clock bindings only. > >>> Please suggest if I should send a new version with that fix. > >> > >> I have fixed that in my branch and I have asked Shephen to look at clk > >> over chat. > >> > > > > I have some unresolved review comments on v9. I'll give reviewed-by when > > that discussion is resolved. > > ok. Do you want to take them via clk tree or via arm-soc tree? >
I'm fine for the clk patch to go via arm-soc if that makes it easier.
