Hi Michal, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-kernel- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal Simek > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2018 11:14 PM > To: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Jolly Shah <[email protected]>; Michal Simek > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Rajan Vaja <[email protected]>; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] drivers: Introduce firmware dnd clock river for > ZynqMP core > > On 2.8.2018 22:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Michal Simek (2018-07-30 05:50:42) > >> On 26.7.2018 18:36, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> Quoting Michal Simek (2018-07-25 02:51:14) > >>>> On 24.7.2018 20:14, Jolly Shah wrote: > >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp-debug.h > >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c create > >>>>>>> mode > >>>>>>> 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/xlnx,zynqmp-clk.h > >>>>>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It looks pretty calm over the last several series that's why when > >>>>>> I get an answer from Stephen or Mike I will take this series via my > >>>>>> tree > and arm-soc tree. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have applied 01-08 here > >>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynqmp/soc > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Michal > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for merging the patches. > >>>>> By mistake I added “Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd [email protected]” for > firmware bindings (Patch01). Stephen had reviewed clock bindings only. > Please > suggest if I should send a new version with that fix. > >>>> > >>>> I have fixed that in my branch and I have asked Shephen to look at > >>>> clk over chat. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I have some unresolved review comments on v9. I'll give reviewed-by > >>> when that discussion is resolved. > >> > >> ok. Do you want to take them via clk tree or via arm-soc tree? > >> > > > > I'm fine for the clk patch to go via arm-soc if that makes it easier. > > > > ok. Great. > Jolly: Please address all Stephen's comments that we can move. > > Thanks, > Michal
Posted V11 patch set with all his comments addressed. Thanks, Jolly Shah
