Quoting Peng Fan (2018-08-12 18:15:41)
> Hi Anson,
> 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Anson Huang
> > > > Sent: 2018年8月8日 12:39
> > > > To: shawn...@kernel.org; s.ha...@pengutronix.de;
> > > > ker...@pengutronix.de; Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>;
> > > > mturque...@baylibre.com; sb...@kernel.org;
> > > > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-...@nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove clks_init_on array
> > > >
> > > > Clock framework will enable those clocks registered with
> > > > CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag, so no need to have clks_init_on array during
> > > > clock
> > > initialization now.
> > >
> > > Will it be more flexible to parse dts saying "critical-clocks = <xxx>"
> > > or "init-on-arrary=<xxx>"
> > > and enable those clocks?
> > 
> > Parsing the clocks arrays from dtb is another way of enabling critical 
> > clocks, but
> > for current i.MX6/7 platforms, we implement it in same way as most of other
> > SoCs, currently I did NOT see any necessity of putting them in dtb, just 
> > adding
> > flag during clock registering is more simple, if there is any special 
> > requirement
> > for different clocks set to be enabled, then we can add support to enable 
> > the
> > method of parsing critical-clocks from dtb. Just my two cents.
> 
> Thinking about OP-TEE want to use one device, but it's clocks are registered
> by Linux, because there is no module in Linux side use it, it will shutdown 
> the clock,
> which cause OP-TEE could not access the device.
> 
> Then people have to modify clk code to add CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag to make sure
> the clocks are not shutdown by Linux.
> 
> However adding a new property in clk node and let driver code parse the dts,
> there is no need to modify clk driver code when OP-TEE needs another device 
> clock.
> 

If OP-TEE needs linux to keep things on then why can't the OP-TEE driver
in Linux probe, acquire clocks, and keep the clks enabled forever?

Reply via email to