On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:16:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:03:55PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: >> From: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agra...@amd.com> >> >> [ Upstream commit 9fb4c2bf130b922c77c16a8368732699799c40de ] >> >> Take into account the base delay set in pointer callback. >> >> There are cases where a pointer function populates >> runtime->delay, such as: >> ./sound/pci/hda/hda_controller.c >> ./sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c > >I'm worried that if anyone notices this at all they will have already >compensated for the delays in userspace and therefore this will cause >them to see problems as they get double compenstation for delays.
But what happens when they update to a newer Stable? They're going to hit that issue anyways.
