On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 10:21 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018, Yang, Bin wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 09:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018, Yang, Bin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 14:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > > > I just write a test.c to compare the result between overlap() and > > > > original within(). > > > > > > You are right. Your version of doing the overlap exclusive works. I > > > misread > > > the conditions. I still prefer doing inclusive checks because they are way > > > more obvious. > > > > I am sorry for my poor english. What is "inclusive checks"? > > Exlusive: val >= start && val < end > > Inclusive: val >= start && val <= end > > So the difference is that you feed exclusive with: > > end = start + size > > and inclusive with > > end = start + size - 1 >
Thanks. I will change it to inclusive check. > Thanks, > > tglx > >
