On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 09:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote: > > Typically the assert is expected to not fail. > > This whole assert can be removed. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.sto...@huawei.com> > > Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com> > > Most probably that I missed discussion, but anyway, does this > "Acked-by" come from internal or external discussion?
This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I
acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it
didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since only one patch out of some
large number touched rdma files). Now it is being resent as not part of
a series, but my ack was preserved.
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
