> How much of that is due to the fact that the 2.4.0 scheduler interrupts > processes more often than 2.2.x? Is the better interactivity worth the > slight drop in performance? What better interactivity ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than U... Mike Galbraith
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test1... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-... John Fremlin
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.... Rik van Riel
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than U... Alan Cox
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Zdenek Kabelac
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Rik van Riel
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Gerhard Mack
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Alan Cox
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% ... Rogier Wolff
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% ... Russell King
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% ... george anzinger
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster th... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% fast... Linus Torvalds
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% ... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% ... Steven Cole
- Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than U... Gabor Lenart