Russell King wrote:
> 
> Rogier Wolff writes:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > What better interactivity ;)
> > Thus to me, 2.4 FEELS much less interactive. When I move windows they
> > don't follow the mouse in real-time.
> 
> Interesting observation: in a scrolling rxvt, kernel 2.0 is smoother than
> 2.2, which is smoother than 2.4.  I hope this trend isn't going to
> continue to 2.6. ;(

Could this be due to the shorter times caculated by the scheduler
recaculate code with the change that moved "nice" into the task_struct? 

George
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to