On 09/10/2018 01:15 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Waiman Long wrote: > >> One major issue with a combined count/owner is that we may have to use >> cmpxchg for reader lock which will certainly impact reader-heavy >> workloads. I have also thought about ways to compress the task pointer >> address so that it can use fewer bits and leave the rests for reader >> count. It is probably doable on 64-bit systems, but likely not on 32-bit >> system given that there are less bits to play around. > > Yeah we've discussed this before. As a cleanup it would obviously be > good, > but I fear about raw performance loss when using cmpxchg instead of xadd.
I don't think using cmpxchg for writers will be a performance issue. However, using cmpxchg for readers will be. One thought that I have is to use the tid of the writer on the lower half and use the upper half for reader count. However, there is some overhead in translating tid to task pointer. So I don't know how useful that may be. So we may still need to keep the owner field around. Cheers, Longman