On 11/09/2018 02:42, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> lru_lock needs to be held to update memcg LRU statistics.  This
> requirement arises fairly naturally based on when the stats are updated
> because callers are holding lru_lock already.
> 
> In preparation for allowing concurrent adds and removes from the LRU,
> however, make concurrent updates to these statistics safe without
> lru_lock.  The lock continues to be held until later in the series, when
> it is replaced with a rwlock that also disables preemption, maintaining
> the assumption of __mod_lru_zone_size, which is introduced here.
> 
> Follow the existing pattern for statistics in memcontrol.h by using a
> combination of per-cpu counters and atomics.
> 
> Remove the negative statistics warning from ca707239e8a7 ("mm:
> update_lru_size warn and reset bad lru_size").  Although an earlier
> version of this patch updated the warning to account for the error
> introduced by the per-cpu counters, Hugh says this warning has not been
> seen in the wild and that for simplicity's sake it should probably just
> be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  mm/memcontrol.c            | 29 +++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index d99b71bc2c66..6377dc76dc41 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter {
>  };
> 
>  struct lruvec_stat {
> -     long count[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> +     long node[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> +     long lru_zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES][NR_LRU_LISTS];

It might be better to use different name for the lru_zone_size field to
distinguish it from the one in the mem_cgroup_per_node structure.

>  };
> 
>  /*
> @@ -109,9 +110,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
>       struct lruvec           lruvec;
> 
>       struct lruvec_stat __percpu *lruvec_stat_cpu;
> -     atomic_long_t           lruvec_stat[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> -
> -     unsigned long           lru_zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES][NR_LRU_LISTS];
> +     atomic_long_t           node_stat[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> +     atomic_long_t           lru_zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES][NR_LRU_LISTS];
> 
>       struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter  iter[DEF_PRIORITY + 1];
> 
> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_lru_size(struct lruvec 
> *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
> 
>       mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
>       for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++)
> -             nr_pages += mz->lru_zone_size[zid][lru];
> +             nr_pages += atomic64_read(&mz->lru_zone_size[zid][lru]);
>       return nr_pages;
>  }
> 
> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size(struct lruvec 
> *lruvec,
>       struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
> 
>       mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> -     return mz->lru_zone_size[zone_idx][lru];
> +     return atomic64_read(&mz->lru_zone_size[zone_idx][lru]);
>  }
> 
>  void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(void);
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline unsigned long lruvec_page_state(struct 
> lruvec *lruvec,
>               return node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), idx);
> 
>       pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> -     x = atomic_long_read(&pn->lruvec_stat[idx]);
> +     x = atomic_long_read(&pn->node_stat[idx]);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>       if (x < 0)
>               x = 0;
> @@ -601,12 +601,12 @@ static inline void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec 
> *lruvec,
>       __mod_memcg_state(pn->memcg, idx, val);
> 
>       /* Update lruvec */
> -     x = val + __this_cpu_read(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->count[idx]);
> +     x = val + __this_cpu_read(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->node[idx]);
>       if (unlikely(abs(x) > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH)) {
> -             atomic_long_add(x, &pn->lruvec_stat[idx]);
> +             atomic_long_add(x, &pn->node_stat[idx]);
>               x = 0;
>       }
> -     __this_cpu_write(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->count[idx], x);
> +     __this_cpu_write(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->node[idx], x);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> @@ -619,6 +619,29 @@ static inline void mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec 
> *lruvec,
>       local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * __mod_lru_zone_size - update memcg lru statistics in batches
> + *
> + * Updates memcg lru statistics using per-cpu counters that spill into 
> atomics
> + * above a threshold.
> + *
> + * Assumes that the caller has disabled preemption.  IRQs may be enabled
> + * because this function is not called from irq context.
> + */
> +static inline void __mod_lru_zone_size(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn,
> +                                    enum lru_list lru, int zid, int val)
> +{
> +     long x;
> +     struct lruvec_stat __percpu *lruvec_stat_cpu = pn->lruvec_stat_cpu;
> +
> +     x = val + __this_cpu_read(lruvec_stat_cpu->lru_zone_size[zid][lru]);
> +     if (unlikely(abs(x) > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH)) {
> +             atomic_long_add(x, &pn->lru_zone_size[zid][lru]);
> +             x = 0;
> +     }
> +     __this_cpu_write(lruvec_stat_cpu->lru_zone_size[zid][lru], x);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void __mod_lruvec_page_state(struct page *page,
>                                          enum node_stat_item idx, int val)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2bd3df3d101a..5463ad160e10 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -962,36 +962,20 @@ struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page 
> *page, struct pglist_data *pgd
>   * @zid: zone id of the accounted pages
>   * @nr_pages: positive when adding or negative when removing
>   *
> - * This function must be called under lru_lock, just before a page is added
> - * to or just after a page is removed from an lru list (that ordering being
> - * so as to allow it to check that lru_size 0 is consistent with list_empty).
> + * This function must be called just before a page is added to, or just 
> after a
> + * page is removed from, an lru list.  Callers aren't required to hold 
> lru_lock
> + * because these statistics use per-cpu counters and atomics.
>   */
>  void mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru,
>                               int zid, int nr_pages)
>  {
>       struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
> -     unsigned long *lru_size;
> -     long size;
> 
>       if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>               return;
> 
>       mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> -     lru_size = &mz->lru_zone_size[zid][lru];
> -
> -     if (nr_pages < 0)
> -             *lru_size += nr_pages;
> -
> -     size = *lru_size;
> -     if (WARN_ONCE(size < 0,
> -             "%s(%p, %d, %d): lru_size %ld\n",
> -             __func__, lruvec, lru, nr_pages, size)) {
> -             VM_BUG_ON(1);
> -             *lru_size = 0;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (nr_pages > 0)
> -             *lru_size += nr_pages;
> +     __mod_lru_zone_size(mz, lru, zid, nr_pages);
>  }
> 
>  bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> @@ -1833,9 +1817,10 @@ static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
>                               struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
> 
>                               pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
> -                             x = 
> this_cpu_xchg(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->count[i], 0);
> +                             x = this_cpu_xchg(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->node[i],
> +                                               0);
>                               if (x)
> -                                     atomic_long_add(x, &pn->lruvec_stat[i]);
> +                                     atomic_long_add(x, &pn->node_stat[i]);
>                       }
>               }
> 

Reply via email to