On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 13:00, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Commit 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
> properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
> handler. In part this was done because the AST2500 datasheet says:
>
> I2CD10 Interrupt Status Register
> bit 2 Receive Done Interrupt status
> S/W needs to clear this status bit to allow next data receiving.
>
> Acknowledging Receive Done before receive data was handled resulted in
> receive errors on high speed I2C busses.
>
> However, interrupt acknowledgment was not only moved to the end of the
> interrupt handler for Receive Done Interrupt status, but for all interrupt
> status bits. This could result in race conditions if a second interrupt was
> received during interrupt handling and not handled but still acknowledged
> at the end of the interrupt handler.
>
> Acknowledge only "Receive Done Interrupt status" late in the interrupt
> handler to solve the problem.
>
> Fixes: 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
> properly")
> Cc: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun....@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
Thanks for getting to the bottom of this Guenter. I gave it a spin on
Romulus (ast2500) and Palmetto (ast2400) without issue.
Tested-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au>
Cheers,
Joel
