Hi Janusz, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote on Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:45:24 -0700:
> Hi, > > * Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzy...@gmail.com> [180905 20:56]: > > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:47:57 AM CEST Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > Patch 2/3 does not apply on nand/next. Indeed the driver does not look > > > the same as in the diff. > > > > That's because I built it on top of my former series from the mid of July, > > containing "[PATCH v2 2/3 v4] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO lookup > > table". > > It was acked by you, Miquel, and supposed to be merged via linux-omap tree. > > > > Hmm I thought the plan was for dependencies to clear and then > merge the rest via various driver trees.. Or at least I don't have > the patch above tagged anywhere for me to merge. Then again, I > try to forget everything posted before -rc1 just to stay sane :) > > > > I don't see any changes on my side that could > > > explain this so perhaps you could rebase on top of 4.19-rc2 (or > > > nand/next, as you wish) and resend the series? > > > > As far as I can see, Tony hasn't applied that series yet, so maybe I can > > still > > move that patch out of there and insert it into this series in front of the > > other 3 patches and resend. That would however make patch 3/3 of that old > > series depend on this one. > > > > Tony, what do you think? > > Yes please resend based on v4.19-rc1 or MTD next. If there > are still pending dependencies, please let us know and we can > set up an immutable branch against v4.19-rc1 with those for > MTD and me to merge in as needed. > > Regards, > > Tony AFAIR I didn't received any new patches from you since Tony suggestion. If you haven't done it already, please rebase against nand/next before sending patches (internal API changed a bit, it might be worth fixing the conflicts before sending them). Thanks, Miquèl
