Hi Boris,

Thanks for the review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 2:52 PM
> To: Manish Narani <mnar...@xilinx.com>
> Cc: robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; mche...@kernel.org;
> Michal Simek <mich...@xilinx.com>; leoyang...@nxp.com;
> sudeep.ho...@arm.com; amit.kuche...@linaro.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> e...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] edac: synopsys: Add macro defines for ZynqMP
> DDRC
> 
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 07:55:02PM +0530, Manish Narani wrote:
> > Add macro defines for ZynqMP DDR controller. These macros will be used
> > for ZyqnMP ECC operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <manish.nar...@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c | 168
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 168 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> > b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c index eb458e5..6bf7959 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,174 @@
> >  #define SCRUB_MODE_MASK            0x7
> >  #define SCRUB_MODE_SECDED  0x4
> >
> > +/* DDR ECC Quirks */
> > +#define DDR_ECC_INTR_SUPPORT               BIT(0)
> > +#define DDR_ECC_DATA_POISON_SUPPORT        BIT(1)
> 
> All those new additions are one column further to the left than the old ones.
> Why?
> 
> Is there some significance here or can they all be vertically aligned?
Should I increase the alignment of the existing macros in the 'code formatting' 
patches? New macros will need an increased indentation.

Thanks,
Manish

Reply via email to