Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] clk: imx: add imx composite clock

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Sascha,

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> It's:
>         rate = *prate / prediv_value;
>         rate = rate / div_value;

Yes, this looks correct. Thanks for the feedback.

> To me this looks correct. However, For an unsigned long type we have
> DIV_ROUND_UP() with which we do not need any casting. For 64bit code
> unsigned long is 64bit anyway which makes the cast a no-op and for 32bit
> code there's also no point in exanding the initial 32bit value to 64bit.

That's a good point too.

Thanks