On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:58:37PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu() doesn't set get_pdptr() hook and is this > not a problem just because MMU context is already initialized and this > hook points to kvm_pdptr_read(). As we're intended to use a dedicated > MMU for shadow EPT MMU set this hook explicitly. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > index ca79ec0d8060..2bdc63f67886 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > @@ -4846,6 +4846,8 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > bool execonly, > context->root_level = PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL; > context->direct_map = false; > context->base_role.word = root_page_role.word & mmu_base_role_mask.word; > + context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
Would it make sense to set this in nested_ept_init_mmu_context() along with set_cr3, get_cr3 and inject_page_fault? The other MMU flows set them as a package deal. Either way... Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com> > + > update_permission_bitmask(vcpu, context, true); > update_pkru_bitmask(vcpu, context, true); > update_last_nonleaf_level(vcpu, context);
