On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Subject: x86/cpu: Sanitize FAM6_ATOM naming
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> > > Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:17:27 -0700
> > > 
> > > Going primarily by:
> > > 
> > >   
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors#Silvermont_microarchitecture
> > > 
> > > with additional information gleaned from other related pages; notably:
> > > 
> > >  - Bonnell shrink was called Saltwell
> > >  - Moorefield is the Merriefield refresh which makes it Airmont
> > > 
> > > The general naming scheme is: FAM6_ATOM_UARCH_SOCTYPE
> > > 
> > > Cc: x...@kernel.org
> > > Cc: mi...@redhat.com
> > > Cc: a...@linux.intel.com
> > > Cc: t...@linutronix.de
> > > Cc: dave.han...@linux.intel.com
> > > Cc: len.br...@intel.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
> > 
> > Which way do we route that?
> 
> I have it stuck in with some perf patches, does that work?

Sure. We just should do a quick check against -next for the files outside
the tip realm.

Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to