Quoting Taniya Das (2018-09-18 03:25:38)
> @@ -3469,6 +3495,8 @@ enum {
>         [GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK_SRC] = &gcc_qspi_core_clk_src.clkr,
>         [GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK] = &gcc_qspi_core_clk.clkr,
>         [GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK] = &gcc_qspi_cnoc_periph_ahb_clk.clkr,
> +       [GCC_LPASS_Q6_AXI_CLK] = NULL,
> +       [GCC_LPASS_SWAY_CLK] = NULL,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct qcom_reset_map gcc_sdm845_resets[] = {
> @@ -3583,6 +3611,13 @@ static int gcc_sdm845_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>  
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,lpass-protected")) 
> {

Shouldn't this be negated? So that we only add the clks when lpass isn't
protected?

> +               gcc_sdm845_clocks[GCC_LPASS_Q6_AXI_CLK] =
> +                       &gcc_lpass_q6_axi_clk.clkr;
> +               gcc_sdm845_clocks[GCC_LPASS_SWAY_CLK] =
> +                       &gcc_lpass_sway_clk.clkr;
> +       }
> +
>         return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &gcc_sdm845_desc, regmap);

Reply via email to