On 2018-10-02 03:14, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>       /* clear bits array to a clean slate */
>       bitmap_zero(bits, chip->ngpio);
>  
> -     /* get bits are evaluated a gpio port register at a time */
> -     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ports); i++) {
> -             /* gpio offset in bits array */
> -             bits_offset = i * gpio_reg_size;
> -
> -             /* word index for bits array */
> -             word_index = BIT_WORD(bits_offset);
> -
> -             /* gpio offset within current word of bits array */
> -             word_offset = bits_offset % BITS_PER_LONG;
> -
> -             /* mask of get bits for current gpio within current word */
> -             word_mask = mask[word_index] & (port_mask << word_offset);
> -             if (!word_mask) {
> -                     /* no get bits in this port so skip to next one */
> -                     continue;
> -             }
> -
> -             /* read bits from current gpio port */
> +     for_each_set_clump(i, word, offset, mask, ARRAY_SIZE(ports), 8) {
>               port_state = inb(dio48egpio->base + ports[i]);
> -
> -             /* store acquired bits at respective bits array offset */
> -             bits[word_index] |= port_state << word_offset;
> +             bits[word] |= port_state << offset;

Somewhat unrelated to this series, but is the existing code correct? I'd
expect the RHS to be masked by word_mask; otherwise we might set bits in
bits[] that were not requested? And if one does that, the !word_mask
test is merely an optimization to avoid reading the gpios when the
result would be ignored anyway. Perhaps no caller cares.

Rasmus

Reply via email to