Hi Ricardo,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:43:49 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[email protected]> wrote:
> @@ -248,14 +252,19 @@ static int gpio_flash_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>
> i = 0;
> do {
> - if (devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, state->gpio_addrs[i],
> - DRIVER_NAME)) {
> + unsigned int *gpio_id = (unsigned int *)gpios->start;
> +
> + if (devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, gpio_id[i], GPIOD_OUT_LOW,
> + DRIVER_NAME)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request gpio %d\n",
> - state->gpio_addrs[i]);
> + gpio_id[i]);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> - gpio_direction_output(state->gpio_addrs[i], 0);
> - } while (++i < state->gpio_count);
> +
> + state->gpios->desc[i] = gpio_to_desc(gpio_id[i]);
> + if (!state->gpios->desc[i])
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } while (++i < state->gpios->ndescs);
Actually, I was thinking about using devm_gpiod_get_array() here and
defining a gpio lookup table in the board file registering the device.
This way, adding support for DT based parsing is transparent.
Regards,
Boris