On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > Why? Forcing all the report buffer to be limited to be non-sleeping > > allocations just because of two drivers, looks like an overkill, and > > actually calls for more issues (as GFP_ATOMIC is of course in principle > > less likely to succeed). > > Okay, I thought that using GFP_ATOMIC is the simplest way to fix these bugs. > But I check the Linux kernel code again, and find that hid_hw_request() are > called at many places. > So changing this function may affect many drivers. > I agree to only change the two drivers, and explicitly anotate __hid_request() > with might_sleep().
Thanks. Are you planning to submit a patch to do that? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
