On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:24:09PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 15:02 > > To: Winkler, Tomas <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>; Nayna Jain > > <[email protected]>; Usyskin, Alexander > > <[email protected]>; Struk, Tadeusz <[email protected]>; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/21] tpm: move pcr extend code to tpm2-cmd.c > > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:58:25AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > > > Add tpm2_pcr_extend() function to tpm2-cmd.c with signature > > > > > required by tpm-interface.c. It wraps the original open code > > implementation. > > > > > The original original tpm2_pcr_extend() function is renamed to > > > > > __tpm2_pcr_extend() and made static, it is called only from new > > > > > tpm2_pcr_extend(). > > > > > > > > > > Fix warnings in __tpm2_pcr_extend() > > > > > tpm2-cmd.c:251:16: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned > > > > > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] > > > > > tpm2-cmd.c:252:17: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned > > > > > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > We do not want the signature change, especially because as we are > > > > working on getting Roberto's changes in and also because it has > > > > absolutely a zero gain. Who cares if those functions take different > > parameters? I don't. > > > > > > Yes, we do care this series tries to have a clean cut between 1.x and 2.x > > specs. Please, let's finish one transformation and then move to another. > > > I understand that Roberto will have to rebase anyhow, if this series goes > > > in > > first, if this is hard I can do it myself, it's trivial. > > > > > > Tomas > > > > I'm happy to tune this minor stuff. > What minor stuff? This patch is just okay, let's change the API in next > round.
The patch is not okay because it does a completely unnecessary API change. /Jarkko
