On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:35:02PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:24:09PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 15:02 > > > To: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.wink...@intel.com> > > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca>; Nayna Jain > > > <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Usyskin, Alexander > > > <alexander.usys...@intel.com>; Struk, Tadeusz <tadeusz.st...@intel.com>; > > > linux-integr...@vger.kernel.org; linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org; > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; roberto.sa...@huawei.com > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/21] tpm: move pcr extend code to tpm2-cmd.c > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:58:25AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > > > > Add tpm2_pcr_extend() function to tpm2-cmd.c with signature > > > > > > required by tpm-interface.c. It wraps the original open code > > > implementation. > > > > > > The original original tpm2_pcr_extend() function is renamed to > > > > > > __tpm2_pcr_extend() and made static, it is called only from new > > > > > > tpm2_pcr_extend(). > > > > > > > > > > > > Fix warnings in __tpm2_pcr_extend() > > > > > > tpm2-cmd.c:251:16: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned > > > > > > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] > > > > > > tpm2-cmd.c:252:17: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned > > > > > > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com> > > > > > > > > > > We do not want the signature change, especially because as we are > > > > > working on getting Roberto's changes in and also because it has > > > > > absolutely a zero gain. Who cares if those functions take different > > > parameters? I don't. > > > > > > > > Yes, we do care this series tries to have a clean cut between 1.x and > > > > 2.x > > > specs. Please, let's finish one transformation and then move to another. > > > > I understand that Roberto will have to rebase anyhow, if this series > > > > goes in > > > first, if this is hard I can do it myself, it's trivial. > > > > > > > > Tomas > > > > > > I'm happy to tune this minor stuff. > > What minor stuff? This patch is just okay, let's change the API in next > > round. > > The patch is not okay because it does a completely unnecessary API > change.
Other minor stuff was missing commas in the list of return values if I recall... /Jarkko