On 11.10.2018 16:45, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 11:58:53AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> @@ -329,7 +469,7 @@ static int record__mmap_evlist(struct record *rec,
>>
>> if (perf_evlist__mmap_ex(evlist, opts->mmap_pages,
>> opts->auxtrace_mmap_pages,
>> - opts->auxtrace_snapshot_mode) < 0) {
>> + opts->auxtrace_snapshot_mode,
>> opts->nr_cblocks) < 0) {
>> if (errno == EPERM) {
>> pr_err("Permission error mapping pages.\n"
>> "Consider increasing "
>> @@ -513,6 +653,29 @@ static struct perf_event_header finished_round_event = {
>> .type = PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND,
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
>> +static void record__mmap_read_sync(struct record *rec)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct perf_evlist *evlist = rec->evlist;
>> + struct perf_mmap *maps = evlist->mmap;
>> +
>> + if (!rec->opts.nr_cblocks)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < evlist->nr_mmaps; i++) {
>> + struct perf_mmap *map = &maps[i];
>> +
>> + if (map->base)
>> + record__aio_sync(map);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static void record__mmap_read_sync(struct record *rec __maybe_unused)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> please move this up so we have just one 'ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT' block
>
> and change the name to record__aio_mmap_read_sync, so it's obvious it's
> aio related, like the rest of the functions you added
Accepted.
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
