On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:20:19 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> wrote:
> Hi Tudor, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tudor Ambarus [mailto:tudor.amba...@microchip.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:31 PM > > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com>; Boris Brezillon > > <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> > > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@wedev4u.fr>; marek.va...@gmail.com; > > dw...@infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; rich...@nod.at; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; nicolas.fe...@microchip.com; > > cyrille.pitc...@microchip.com; linux-...@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm- > > ker...@lists.infradead.org; cristian.bir...@microchip.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP > > SPI > > NOR flash memories > > > > Hi, Yogesh, > > > > On 10/17/2018 10:46 AM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote: > > > Hi Boris, > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezil...@bootlin.com] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM > > >> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> > > >> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@wedev4u.fr>; Tudor Ambarus > > >> <tudor.amba...@microchip.com>; marek.va...@gmail.com; > > >> dw...@infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; rich...@nod.at; > > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; nicolas.fe...@microchip.com; > > >> cyrille.pitc...@microchip.com; linux-...@lists.infradead.org; > > >> linux-arm- ker...@lists.infradead.org; cristian.bir...@microchip.com > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform > > >> SFDP SPI NOR flash memories > > >> > > >> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200 > > >> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200 > > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000 > > >>>> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file. > > >>>>> For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I > > >>>>> have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected > > >>>>> flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also > > >>>>> points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s", > > >>>>> INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 > > >>>>> * 1024, 256, ....} > > >>>>> > > >>>>> But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1 > > >>>>> protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are > > >>>>> wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is > > >>>>> being send as opcode instead of 0xEC. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If I revert this patch, reads are working fine. > > >>>> > > >>>> Can you try with the following patch? > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B > > >>> mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes. > > > Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 > > > mode read > > opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Can you try with this patch applied? > > >> > > > With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly. > > > > > > [ 1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80 > > > [ 1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22) > > > [ 1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8) > > > [ 1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc) > > > [ 1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes) > > > > > > Without this patch, param_headers are getting freed and restoring > > > previous > > erase map i.e. opcode related to 1-1-4 protocol. > > > > > > > Can you add some prints in spi_nor_parse_smpt() to isolate what's failing? > > We > > should understand whether it's something wrong in spi_nor_parse_smpt() or > > the > > s25fs512s smpt table does not respect the standard. > > > > It's returning failure from below point in func spi_nor_get_map_in_use() > > /* Find the matching configuration map */ > while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) { > if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END) { > printk("%d %s \n", __LINE__, __func__); > goto out; > } Can you dump the smpt array just before calling spi_nor_get_map_in_use()? > -- > Regards > Yogesh Gaur. > > > Thanks, > > ta > > >