On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:20:19 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> wrote:

> Hi Tudor,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tudor Ambarus [mailto:tudor.amba...@microchip.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:31 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com>; Boris Brezillon
> > <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com>
> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@wedev4u.fr>; marek.va...@gmail.com;
> > dw...@infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; rich...@nod.at;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; nicolas.fe...@microchip.com;
> > cyrille.pitc...@microchip.com; linux-...@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
> > ker...@lists.infradead.org; cristian.bir...@microchip.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP 
> > SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> > 
> > Hi, Yogesh,
> > 
> > On 10/17/2018 10:46 AM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:  
> > > Hi Boris,
> > >  
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezil...@bootlin.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM
> > >> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com>
> > >> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@wedev4u.fr>; Tudor Ambarus
> > >> <tudor.amba...@microchip.com>; marek.va...@gmail.com;
> > >> dw...@infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; rich...@nod.at;
> > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; nicolas.fe...@microchip.com;
> > >> cyrille.pitc...@microchip.com; linux-...@lists.infradead.org;
> > >> linux-arm- ker...@lists.infradead.org; cristian.bir...@microchip.com
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform
> > >> SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200
> > >> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >>  
> > >>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200
> > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > >>>  
> > >>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000
> > >>>> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> wrote:
> > >>>>  
> > >>>>>>  
> > >>>>> Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file.
> > >>>>> For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I
> > >>>>> have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected
> > >>>>> flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also
> > >>>>> points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s",
> > >>>>> INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256
> > >>>>> * 1024, 256, ....}
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1
> > >>>>> protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are
> > >>>>> wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is
> > >>>>> being send as opcode instead of 0xEC.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If I revert this patch, reads are working fine.  
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can you try with the following patch?
> > >>>>  
> > >>>
> > >>> Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B
> > >>> mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes.  
> > > Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 
> > > mode read  
> > opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode.  
> > >>>  
> > >>
> > >> Can you try with this patch applied?
> > >>  
> > > With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly.
> > >
> > >   [    1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> > >   [    1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22)
> > >   [    1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8)
> > >   [    1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc)
> > >   [    1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
> > >
> > > Without this patch, param_headers are getting freed and restoring 
> > > previous  
> > erase map i.e. opcode related to 1-1-4 protocol.  
> > >  
> > 
> > Can you add some prints in spi_nor_parse_smpt() to isolate what's failing? 
> > We
> > should understand whether it's something wrong in spi_nor_parse_smpt() or 
> > the
> > s25fs512s smpt table does not respect the standard.
> >   
> 
> It's returning failure from below point in func spi_nor_get_map_in_use()
> 
>         /* Find the matching configuration map */
>         while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) {
>                 if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END) {
>                         printk("%d %s \n", __LINE__, __func__);
>                         goto out;
>                 }

Can you dump the smpt array just before calling
spi_nor_get_map_in_use()?

> --
> Regards
> Yogesh Gaur.
> 
> > Thanks,
> > ta
> >   
> 

Reply via email to