Hello, On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:28:04AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > The other, and I think better way, we could fix this is to have an > alternate destroy_never_used_workqueue() function which skips the > drain_workqueue().
Yeah, I'm okay with this approach. Maybe name it destroy_workqueue_skip_drain()? Thanks. -- tejun
