On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:22:13AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:07:37 +0200 Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We reserved a different syscall number than the one that is used right now > > in the patch. Please drop this patch... Martin or I will wire up the syscall > > as soon as the x86 variant is merged. Everything else just causes trouble > > and > > confusion. > > OK, I dropped all the fallocate patches.
Andrew, I want to clarify who is going to push the fallocate patches. I can either push them to Linus as part of the ext4 patch set, or we can wait for you to push them. I thought since you had them in -mm and we were going to wait you to push them (and presume that this was going to happen soon). Alternatively I can push them directly to Linus along with other ext4 patches. We can drop the s390 patch if Martin or Heiko wants to wire it up themselves. As far as I know there hasn't been any real contention on the actual syscall patches, other than the numbering issues, so it seems that pushing them to Linus sooner rather than later is the right thing to do. I don't particularly care who pushes them, just as long as they get pushed. :-) So if you've dropped, shall I push them to Linus as part of the ext4 patches we've been planning on pushing? Regards, - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/