On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:48:54PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/8/18 1:22 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> +struct cet_kernel_state {
> >> + u64 kernel_ssp; /* kernel shadow stack */
> >> + u64 pl1_ssp; /* ring-1 shadow stack */
> >> + u64 pl2_ssp; /* ring-2 shadow stack */
> >> +} __packed;
> >> +
> > Why are these __packed? It seems like it'll generate bad code for no
> > obvious purpose.
>
> It's a hardware-defined in-memory structure. Granted, we'd need a
> really wonky compiler to make that anything *other* than a nicely-packed
> 24-byte structure, but the __packed makes it explicit.
>
> It is probably a really useful long-term thing to stop using __packed
> and start using "__hw_defined" or something that #defines down to __packed.
packed doesn't mean "don't leave gaps". It means:
'packed'
The 'packed' attribute specifies that a variable or structure field
should have the smallest possible alignment--one byte for a
variable, and one bit for a field, unless you specify a larger
value with the 'aligned' attribute.
So Andy's right. It tells the compiler, "this struct will not be naturally
aligned, it will be aligned to a 1-byte boundary". Which is silly. If we have
struct b {
unsigned long x;
} __packed;
struct a {
char c;
struct b b;
};
we want struct b to start at offset 8, but with __packed, it will start
at offset 1.
Delete __packed. It doesn't do what you think it does.
