On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What? IBPB makes tons of sense even without STIBP.
On non-SMT, yes. But this patchset ties those two the other (sensible) way
around AFAICS ("STIBP iff (IBPB && SMT)").
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What? IBPB makes tons of sense even without STIBP.
On non-SMT, yes. But this patchset ties those two the other (sensible) way
around AFAICS ("STIBP iff (IBPB && SMT)").
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs