On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What? IBPB makes tons of sense even without STIBP.
On non-SMT, yes. But this patchset ties those two the other (sensible) way around AFAICS ("STIBP iff (IBPB && SMT)"). -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What? IBPB makes tons of sense even without STIBP.
On non-SMT, yes. But this patchset ties those two the other (sensible) way around AFAICS ("STIBP iff (IBPB && SMT)"). -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs