On 19/11/2018 17:14, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > * Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [181119 16:19]: >> * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> [181119 10:16]: >>> On 2018-11-13 20:06, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>> Looks like the IRQ_TYPE_NONE issue still is there for omap5 and >>>> should be fixed with IRQ_TYPE_HIGH. >>>> >>>> No idea about why palmas interrupts would stop working though, >>>> Peter, do you have any ideas on this one? >>> >>> No, I don't. >>> The INT polarity can be changed in Palmas. >>> based on the pdata->irq_flags (queried via irqd_get_trigger_type()) >>> the code configures it: >>> >>> if (pdata->irq_flags & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) >>> reg = PALMAS_POLARITY_CTRL_INT_POLARITY; >>> else >>> reg = 0; >>> >>> and we pass the same irq_flags to the regmap_add_irq_chip() >>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH == IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH == 0x00000004 >>> >>> A change in DT should be enough, no need to patch palmas.c, imho. >> >> But it's not. I'm now wondering if wakeupgen is inverting the >> polarity for this interrupt? >> >> GIC docs say this about SPI interrupts: >> >> "SPI is triggered on a rising edge or is active-HIGH level-sensitive." >> >> So when setting IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH in dts, we still must not >> invert the polarity in palmas while tegra needs to. So either >> tegra114 hardware is inverting the polarity, or omap5 wakeupgen >> is. >> >> Does the palmas trm say which way PALMAS_POLARITY_CTRL >> triggers if PALMAS_POLARITY_CTRL_INT_POLARITY is set? >> >> Also note that dra7 is using a gpio for palmas interrupt. > > Well so commit 7e9d474954f4 ("ARM: tegra: Correct polarity for > Tegra114 PMIC interrupt") states that tegra114 inverts the > polarity of the PMIC interrupt. So adding Jon and Thierry to Cc.
Yes Tegra can invert the polarity of the PMIC interrupt. > So it seems that commit df545d1cd01a ("mfd: palmas: Provide > irq flags through DT/platform data") wrongly sets the > PALMAS_POLARITY_CTRL_INT_POLARITY on IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH > while it should set it on IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW. > > I think the fix needs to set the polarity using > of_machine_is_compatible() and probably also add a new > compatible to palmas.c for "ti,palmas-tegra114" to properly > deal with the inverted interrupt. Or add a property for > "interrupt-inverted". In any case, it seems that the > of_machine_is_compatible() is also needed too to avoid > breaking use with dtb files. > > Jon & Thierry, can you guys please check and confirm this? I don't fully understand what is being discussed here, but my understanding is that the palmas interrupt is active low. Let me know if this helps. Cheers Jon -- nvpublic