Quoting Weiyi Lu (2018-11-19 18:37:34) > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 11:31 -0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > @@ -226,6 +397,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain > > > *genpd) > > > if (ret < 0) > > > goto err_pwr_ack; > > > > > > + > > > > Drop this. > Why do we try to drop this? Once the power-on step fail, the following > steps should not be permitted. I just see a whitespace addition that doesn't do anything. I suspect it's a style nitpick and common practice to not include spurious diffs in the patch. So remove this hunk?
