On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > >  static char *stibp_state(void)
> > >  {
> > > + if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_IBRS_ENHANCED)
> > > +         return "";
> > 
> > If
> >     spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_IBRS_ENHANCED
> > 
> > then SPEC_CTRL_STIBP should not be set in x86_spec_ctrl_base
> > (stibp_needed() prevents the setting in arch_smt_update()) so the above
> > check should not be needed.
> > 
> > I *think*.
> 
> Yes, makes sense.

For this patch, but for the final thing it does not.

Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to