In contrary to other tests, the test_find_next_and_bit uses tab formatting in output and get_cycles() instead of ktime_get(). get_cycles() is not supported by some arches, so ktime_get() fits better in generic code.
Fix it and minor style issues, so the output looks like this: Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap find_next_bit: 7142816 ns, 163282 iterations find_next_zero_bit: 8545712 ns, 164399 iterations find_last_bit: 6332032 ns, 163282 iterations find_first_bit: 20509424 ns, 16606 iterations find_next_and_bit: 4060016 ns, 73424 iterations Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap find_next_bit: 55984 ns, 656 iterations find_next_zero_bit: 19197536 ns, 327025 iterations find_last_bit: 65088 ns, 656 iterations find_first_bit: 5923712 ns, 656 iterations find_next_and_bit: 29088 ns, 1 iterations Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yno...@caviumnetworks.com> --- lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c index 5367ffa5c18f..f0e394dd2beb 100644 --- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c @@ -108,14 +108,13 @@ static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap, const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len) { unsigned long i, cnt; - cycles_t cycles; + ktime_t time; - cycles = get_cycles(); + time = ktime_get(); for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) - i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i+1); - cycles = get_cycles() - cycles; - pr_err("find_next_and_bit:\t\t%llu cycles, %ld iterations\n", - (u64)cycles, cnt); + i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i + 1); + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); return 0; } -- 2.17.1