On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 9:59 AM Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you realize that the cmpxchg used by the first attempts of the > dynamic modification of code by ftrace was the source of the e1000e > NVRAM corruption bug.
If you have a static call in IO memory, you have bigger problems than that.
What's your point?
Again - I will point out that the things you guys have tried to come
up with have been *WORSE*. Much worse.
Linus
