On 2018/12/3 17:19, Jerome Brunet wrote:
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 14:13 +0800, Xingyu Chen wrote:
The Meson-G12A SoC uses the same GPIO interrupt controller IP block as the
other Meson SoCs, A totle of 100 pins can be spied on, which is the sum of:
- 223:100 undefined (no interrupt)
- 99:97 3 pins on bank GPIOE
- 96:77 20 pins on bank GPIOX
- 76:61 16 pins on bank GPIOA
- 60:53 8 pins on bank GPIOC
- 52:37 16 pins on bank BOOT
- 36:28 9 pins on bank GPIOH
- 27:12 16 pins on bank GPIOZ
- 11:0 12 pins in the AO domain
Signed-off-by: Xingyu Chen <xingyu.c...@amlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianxin Pan <jianxin....@amlogic.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-
gpio.c
index 7b531fd075b8..971e8dea069a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
@@ -67,12 +67,17 @@ static const struct meson_gpio_irq_params axg_params = {
.nr_hwirq = 100,
};
+static const struct meson_gpio_irq_params g12a_params = {
+ .nr_hwirq = 100,
+};
+
Same comment as on i2c, the g12 seems compatible with the axg.
Is this patchset patchset really necessary ?
Although the total number of pins is the same as the Meson-AXG SoC, the
gpio banks and irq numbers are different. To avoid confusion on use, i
think the new compatible string is needed.
static const struct of_device_id meson_irq_gpio_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-gpio-intc", .data = &meson8_params },
{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-gpio-intc", .data = &meson8b_params
},
{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-gpio-intc", .data = &gxbb_params
},
{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxl-gpio-intc", .data = &gxl_params },
{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-axg-gpio-intc", .data = &axg_params },
+ { .compatible = "amlogic,meson-g12a-gpio-intc", .data = &g12a_params
},
{ }
};
.