Hi Andy Gross, David Brown, Vivek, On 30/11/18 3:43 AM, Evan Green wrote: > This series fixes the QMP PHY bindings, which had specified #clock-cells > in the parent node, and had set it to 1. Putting it in the parent node is > wrong because the clock providers are the child nodes, so this change > moves it there. Having it set to 1 is also wrong, since nothing is ever > specified as to what should go in that cell. So this changes it to zero. > Finally, this change completes a little bit of code to actually allow these > exposed clocks to be pointed at in DT. > > I had no idea how to fix up ipq8074.dtsi. It seems to be completely wrong in > that it doesn't specify #clock-cells at all, has no child nodes, and > specifies clock-output-names in the parent node. As far as I can tell this > doesn't work at all. But I can't add the child nodes myself because I don't > know > 1) how many there are, and 2) the registers in them. I also have no way to > test it. > > Speaking of testing, I was able to test this on sdm845, but haven't tested > msm8996.
Can someone help test this series in msm8996? Thanks Kishon > > This patch sits atop the UFS device nodes series [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ > > > > Evan Green (4): > dt-bindings: phy-qcom-qmp: Move #clock-cells to child > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: Fix QMP PHY #clock-cells > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Fix QMP PHY #clock-cells > phy: qcom-qmp: Expose provided clocks to DT > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt | 11 ++++----- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 6 +++-- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 4 ++-- > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >
